<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title type="text">SD Cards</title>
  <updated>2008-10-16T13:57:35+01:00</updated>
  <generator uri="http://framework.zend.com" version="1.12.20">Zend_Feed_Writer</generator>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.augwessex.org.uk/discussions/view/163"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.augwessex.org.uk/discussions/view/163/feed"/>
  <id>https://www.augwessex.org.uk/discussions/view/163</id>
  <author>
    <name>AUGW</name>
    <email>info@augwessex.org.uk</email>
    <uri>https://www.augwessex.org.uk/</uri>
  </author>
  <entry xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[SD Cards]]></title>
    <updated>2008-10-16T10:59:42+01:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.augwessex.org.uk/discussions/view/163#683"/>
    <id>https://www.augwessex.org.uk/discussions/view/163#683</id>
    <author>
      <name>John Surtees</name>
      <email>info@augwessex.org.uk</email>
      <uri>https://www.augwessex.org.uk/</uri>
    </author>
    <content xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" type="xhtml">
      <xhtml:div xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">After a recent holiday, I was downloading our pics and found that a the pics on a Sandisk 1Gig SD Ultra II card were not seen by iPhoto at first. On checking, I found that there were two folders of pics. This is the first time we have used this card. Has anybody else tried an Ultra II ?<xhtml:br/>
<xhtml:br/>
At the third attempt, iPhoto recognised that there were 295 pics on the card and all was well. But it is a concern that it took three attempts to get the card recognised as having pics present.<xhtml:br/>
<xhtml:br/>
The camera is a Panasonic FX55. and we are using iPhoto 5.</xhtml:div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: SD Cards]]></title>
    <updated>2008-10-16T13:57:35+01:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.augwessex.org.uk/discussions/view/163#684"/>
    <id>https://www.augwessex.org.uk/discussions/view/163#684</id>
    <author>
      <name>Mick Burrell</name>
      <email>info@augwessex.org.uk</email>
      <uri>https://www.augwessex.org.uk/</uri>
    </author>
    <content xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" type="xhtml">
      <xhtml:div xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">May not be relevant John but these cards evolve faster than we can keep up with!<xhtml:br/>
<xhtml:br/>
I have an old card reader which is neat, small and works well. At least it did until I bought myself a new card which it wouldn't read. I discovered it would only read the technology available "in its day" i.e. nothing bigger than 256MB! I recently purchased a secondhand camera which would not read the nice big/fast card I bought with it, but a firmware update from Canon solved that. So I'm no longer surprised if existing equipment or software can't keep pace.</xhtml:div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
